|
 The law
06/09/1994 defines the technical methodologies and the procedural
criteria for risk evaluation and inspection, maintenance and clearing of
the materials containing asbestos in the building structures.
This law establishes the need to verify the possibility of asbestos
fibres' release in the building structures where they are contained. In
other words, it is necessary to evaluate the friability of the material
(considered as the facility or possibility of crumbling as a result of
simple manual pressure) and check its state of preservation, assessing,
where appropriate, the lack of coverings and limiting measures.
The law establishes a number of situations where there is no potential
danger of fibres' release if the materials involved are entire and not
susceptible of damage. In such cases it is not necessary to carry out any
clearing intervention, but a periodic inspection is needed to check the
conditions of the materials and the proper maintenance measures.
On the other hand, in other situations it is possible to find materials
that, although entire, are susceptible of damage and where there is a
potential danger of release of the asbestos fibres. In such cases, in the
first place appropriate action must be taken in order to avoid the danger
of damage and, in the second place, a control programme must be
implemented. Should it not be possible to reduce the damage risks, it is
necessary to arrange a clearing intervention medium-term.
Should real dangerous situations be present as a result of the release of
asbestos fibres (spontaneous decay, presence of deteriorated materials
close to ventilation systems, etc.), it is necessary to quickly proceed
at the clearing intervention.
The measures recommended by the regulation of the Ministry of Health for
the clearing intervention are:
- asbestos should be removed and replaced with other suitable materials;
- asbestos should be confined by means of appropriate, specifically
produced, materials and/or by means of bulkheads or sealed false
ceilings.
Asbestos removal has the advantage of being a final solution, although it
entails risks for the operators (only higly specialized personnel must be
employed and appropriate protective and control measures adopted).
|